Sept. 11th Conspiracy Theory Video

I just recently finished watching a video on U Tube entitled loose change. For those of you who have not seen or heard of the video, it is an hour in length, or there about, that describes the conspiracy theories surrounding the events on September 11th. Disturbed is one word to describe my afterthoughts of the video. Claiming that the United States government was behind the terrorists attacks of 9/11, the video provides extremely valid scientific evidence to disprove the bin Laden and Al Queda link American citizens have been told. From the temperature theory about the melted steel to the controlled detonation of towers 1, 2, and 7 to the mismatched proportions of the hole in the Pentagon compared the size of the plane that is reported to have it, the video offers an answer to nearly every question backed by substantiated evidence.
Although it is not in the video, a couple of months ago I came across a photo taken that morning that will not leave my mind. It is a photo of the impact hole in one of the two twin towers and what appears to a woman standing at the edge looking onto the street below. I at first dismissed it as being a fraud until I read that FEMA reportedly used it in their official report of the collapse of the twin towers. FEMA used the photo in order to validate their claims that the reported fires in the two towers were not the only contributing factor to the collapse. As you may or may not know, conspiracy theorists believe the towers were brought down by a set-up and controlled demolition.

Here is the photo:


Theories of America Airlines Flight 93 are also included in the video Loose Change. They state the well known proposal that the airliner was shot down by fighter jets instead of crashing into the field in Pennsylvania. They offer actual eye witness accounts of seeing more than one plane, described to be of a military style, flying significantly low around the crash site area both before and after the reported crash. Voice simulation of the passenger and crew’s final calls home is also disputed. One such account is that of Mark Beamer who contacted his mother during the hijacking. They claim that Mark addressed himself to his own mother with his full name: “This is Mark Beamer”. I don’t know about you, but when I communicate over the telephone with my own mother I do not see it as necessary to address myself with my full name. They also report that his mother asked her son more than once who was responsible for the hijacking. Mark replied to the questions by asking “You believe me don’t you?”
Through this post I am not giving my own support or belief to the given conspiracies. I find them hard to believe and to accept as probable would devastating to the reality that I hold so dear. Due to the fact in which many of the theories can be scientifically proven, it is possible that we were, at the least, lied to about the events and who was responsible for carrying them out. As we have all come to realize, the Bush Administration is not the George Washington of the new millennium. They are not afraid to lie in order to promote their own political agenda. They are not afraid because the majority of the American public or the media no longer question the truth. With all of the events in the current American history such as 9/11, Afghanistan, Iraq, continuous scandals with in the Bush Administration why are we allowing our elected leaders to continue to taunt us into submission with their “unpatriotic” mumbo jumbo?